GROUP DECISION MAKING: DRAWING OUT AND RECONCILING DIFFERENCES
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Group Decision Making
Authors’ Notes This chapter was written with the support of grants from the National Science Foundation to the first (SBR-9730822) and third (BCS-9905397) authors. Support to the second author was provided by the Grantin-Aid for Scientific Research 11610096 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. The chapter was completed while the third author held a N...
متن کاملGroup performance and decision making.
Theory and research on small group performance and decision making is reviewed. Recent trends in group performance research have found that process gains as well as losses are possible, and both are frequently explained by situational and procedural contexts that differentially affect motivation and resource coordination. Research has continued on classic topics (e.g., brainstorming, group goal...
متن کاملReconciling some conflicting evidence on decision making under uncertainty∗
Laboratory experiments concerning decision under uncertainty tend to uncover systematic violations of Bayesian rationality. When models that posit Bayesian rationality are compared to non-experimental data, though, they fit the data well. One possible explanation is that an agent’s global pattern of choices may not be rationalizable, but that the pattern may satisfy weak conditions sufficent to...
متن کاملReconciling Some Con icting Evidence on Decision Making under Uncertainty
Laboratory experiments concerning decision under uncertainty tend to uncover systematic violations of Bayesian rationality. When models that posit Bayesian rationality are compared to non-experimental data, though, they t the data well. One possible explanation is that an agent's global pattern of choices may not be rationalizable, but that the pattern may satisfy weak conditions su cent to rat...
متن کاملGroup Decision Making under Vagueness
We report results of an experiment in which participants provided certainty equivalents for 15 risky or vague (with imprecise probabilities) two-outcome gambles. Participants made their decisions in three different settings: a) individually without prior social interactions, b) individually after discussing decisions with other participants and c) in groups of three. We also manipulated the deg...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
سال: 2017
ISSN: 1936-6744
DOI: 10.13033/ijahp.v9i3.533